Philosophy and Politics

Philosophy has enabled benignant frame life to study the general and everyday problems which concern m any(prenominal) matters to imply beauty, truth, mind, validity, language, existence, language and even truth. While Philosophy is a general status that is highly acceptable to address and answer questions by using authoritative approaches and its credibility on the grounds of reas unmatchedd aims, there is a accent that is app arnt between g everywherening and Philosophy which Ancient Greek fount means love of apprehension. Good governance needs laws that argon cosmosdated and initiated by government.The ways a society is being governed highly affects the kind of living the citizens experience. regime atomic number 18 made up of convocation of throng that formulate decisions for the betterment of the populace. It has also been palpable in earthly concerny group interactions such as the religious, academic and even in the corporate world. despite the fact that both exist to fulfill the needs of humans for order, it is unmixed that a man in 1 point of his life or a nonher might choose whether to live under the see of Politics or Philosophy.The issues had been explored in Platos masterpieces justification and The country. hardly although, the bank line is perceptible, the end result for the mixture of both may lead to a more wonderful life to all mankind. The researcher wishes to address any reconciliation that may occur between the rivalries of the cardinal approaches in man regulation, if Philosophy and Politics fecal matter be practiced at the aforesaid(prenominal) measure. Philosophy and Politics in Platos Works Justice is necessitated by human in all walks of life. An individual is honed by the cultural and tender norms that craft his totality as a whole.Many factors attri unlesse on how a person behaves or acts. The life in the world has sought-after(a) to deal on existence necessitated of man as man to function and subsist. You may choose to live a political life or you potful pursue a life that is committed in purpose contemplation and truth. Apology The Apology by Plato is his version of Socrates obstetrical delivery during the time Socrates defends himself in opposition to the charges. The accusations against Socrates brought up were living his life that refuses to adulate and idolization the gods, corrupts the mind of the young and makes new deities.The main theme of the entire speech proposes that Philosophy instigates when one admits that he is ignorant. Socrates dramatically states that the wisdom he has, originates from his perfect knowledge that he doesnt know anything (23b, 29b). Politics in this soften conducts a rightful(a) proceeding that is made show up of informal charges that solitary(prenominal) stanched out of gossips and prejudices against Socrates Socrates is committing an in nicety, in that he inquires into things below the earth and in the sky, and makes the weaker argum ent the stronger, and teaches a nonher(prenominal)s to keep his example (18b-c).Socrates refuted the accusations through voicing out that he should non in any way be mistaken as a sophist or a scholar that is highly paid and wise. He then expressed his philosophical inspiration that he is poor and does not know anything that is good and noble. Socrates believed that the accusations against him rooted with his compliance with the oracle he authoritative in Delhi. He had the foreign mission of solving the paradox which is the ignorant man could be the wisest of all men (23e). It is apparent that Politics has an indirect linkup to Philosophy because both aim to provide a good human life course.In this part reconciliation is quite evident since Politics is ruled out by spate or humans that invest the way to righteousness and lawfulness based on human detection enacted by the law while Philosophy which Plato deals with dwells more with the spiritual and master intervention as t he correct path to rectitude and uprightness. Socrates perceived that his skeptical to many people gained him the reputation as an annoying person. His life mission interpreted in the speech that true wisdom comes from the gods while wisdoms of man together with their achievements have diminutive or are not blue-chip at all.It was greatly stressed that Socrates accepts as legitimate that the power of his lawful superior, may it be divine or human should be followed. But when there is a discrepancy or conflict between the two Politics or Philosophy, he deems that the divine authority should take precedence and primacy Gentlemen, I am your grateful and devoted servant, but I owe a greater obedience to God than to you and as long as I draw breath and have my faculties I shall never split practicing philosophy (Plato, Dialogue Part 1).Socrates articulated that he will not stop his aspiration for his fellow Athenians to have greater awareness of example truth and goodness. Though, p eople might impede his questioning or statement and even if they withdraw all the charges against him, Socrates put across his plan of not bringing an end to his inquiries for the pursuance of truth. Socrates was charged as guilty by a very small margin (36a). He was sentenced to death through drin top executive Hemlock. Though, Socrates can resort to emotive tricks to appease the juries.He relied in the end to the truth in the presentation of his case. Socrates prophesied that the younger and harsher critics will pursue what he started that can aggravate them even more (39d). The land by Plato The Republic by Plato is also a Socratic dialog. The main topic of the dialogue centers at the issue of who is happier between the just and the unjust man that was figure through creating a make-believe city that is ruled by philosopher-kings. For around part, the dialogue tackles justice in different ways.Like in one part of the first book where two types of justice are presented but b oth were deemed inappropriate. First, talks about returning debts that someone owed while the scrap one embarks upon helping out friends at the same time harming the enemies. These were ballpark definitions of justice that Socrates reckons to be derisory in isolated cases and as a consequence lack stringency stipulated of a definition, though he does not wholly decline them because each, in some way or some other conveys a universal sagacity of justice.Justice when implemented with Philosophy encompasses gracility to all mankind. This was evident in the end of Book I where Socrates ratified Polemarchus insight that justice embraces helping out friends but the just man would never do any harm to anybody even an enemy. Thrasymachus on the other hand provides his perception of justice as what is good for the stronger (Book I), which reflects those people in Politics who have power over the society. This also echoes Thrasymachus belief that rulers are the primary resource of justic e in every city where in they enact laws that benefit themselves the most.Philosophy is widely tackled in The Republic to influence Politics on what it should build within the society to provide a just community. In this dialogue, it can be seen that Philosophy and Politics can be reconciled though Philosophy still takes supremacy over Politics. Correspondingly, Socrates describes justice as working at that which he is naturally trump out suited, along with to do ones own business and not to be a busybody (433a-433b). He then continues by presenting how to sustain and perfect justice through three cardinal virtues to include Temperance, Wisdom, and Courage (433a-433b).Philosophy correlates with Politics through creating a society that divides people in to three explicit types which are the soldier, producer and ruler. Books II to IV mainly carry out that if a ruler can create just laws, and when the soldiers or warriors follow the orders of their rulers, and if authorities are obe yed by the producers, then it will formulate a society that is rightful and just, thus creating a happier life. Three arguments were presented by Plato why he sees that it is better to be just rather than for the individual to be unjust.The arguments were An oppressors nature will allow him to incur horrid breed and pangs and that the conventional tyrant has a lifestyle that is mentally and physically gainsay on a ruler which is the total opposite of a philosopher king that is truth loving (Book IX). Another argument in Book IX that Plato puts forward is that the Philosopher is the only type of ruler that can best political campaign a society since he is acquainted to the Form of the Good. The last one that Plato contends is that Pleasures which are approved by the lover of wisdom and reason are the truest (Book IX).The Republics main ideology is to form the government and government that is governed by philosopher-kings. In this, it is highly susceptible that Philosophy and po litical sympathies could in some way or another worked hand in hand. Socrates believes that the foursome types of ruling such as timocracy, democracy, oligarchy and tyranny can lead to subversive activity of power. The Republic by Plato also contains his Allegory of the Cave where he elucidates how a former prisoner from a cave came to carry through that the sun which illuminates the surround and which initially blinded him is the Form of the Good that causes the brightness.He also came to realize that it is the sun that made him see and appreciate the beauty and goodness in the things that surround him. Plato considers the caveman as the philosopher, who knows the Form of Good and therefore should machinate others to spread the same light he achieved. The dialogue narrates conversations and arguments concerning an Ideal introduce by manipulating politics through Philosophical ideas and how other forms of governance could not properly and adequately sustain its ruling. Conclusi onThough Platos Apology and The Republic mainly discuss how Philosophy or love of wisdom should be adhered over and above anything else, it also manifested that Philosophy and politics can reconcile to the betterment of the society. The Apology chiefly venerates Philosophy over politics but in some parts evidently address that people involved in Politics should be respected and followed, hence, when a brushing between the two takes place Philosophy should win against the other. Platos The Republic on the other hand, points out a Political institution that is to be ruled by a Philosopher towards a just society.