Foundation of Management Social Theory and Organization Studies

Question: Discuss about theFoundation of Managementfor Social Theory and Organization Studies. Answer: Introduction Managerial Ideology refers to the way of managing people through the managerial skills within the organizations. The managerial ideology depends on the ability or managerial skills of the particular managers. Sometimes, the way of managing the employees may break the traditional way employee-employer relationship within the organizations. The concept of the managerial ideology is situation dependent. The main focus of the managerial ideology is to develop a good a relationship with the employees for managing them in a better way. This is the best way of getting better responses from the employees in terms of effort given to the workplaces (Hyde, Clarke and Drennan 2013). In order to get more production from the existing workforce, the managers need to motivate the employees and convince them at their job roles. In this context, the employees must have a good relationship with the managers. In order to build this good relationship, the managers need to use the managerial ideology depe nding on the circumstances (Liu and Li 2014). That means, they have to understand the employees needs, skills and desires. Generally, the managerial ideology says that the managers should ensure that the employees would get their demands fulfilled by the employer organization. They should be assigned with the tasks according to their professional skills or expertise. A good co-operative working environment is required within the workplaces of the organizations. The concept of providing incentives to the employees improving the organizational structure and culture with the present demand are associated with the concept of managerial ideology (Yang 2012). The Rational-bureaucratic model of organization is about the relationship between the parts of mechanical device and the relationship among the positions of the employees within the organization. This is about the completing the jobs by assigning the people with proficiency with the required activities. In order to get the optimum result from the workplace activities regarding the machine operations related activities, the tasks should be assigned to the employees with the required level of knowledge to that field (Abell 2014). In this area, the managers used to face the problem regarding the relationship with the employees. In order to solve the problems and get the right people for right job, the managers should have a good relationship with them and know the expertises of the individual employees. In this area, the managerial structure is very important. A proper structure, where the employees are assigned in particular positions enhances the proficiency of them. The recruitment and selection process is also associated with this context. Hiring right people for the right job is the primary responsibility of the HR managers (Bucherer, Eisert and Gassmann 2012). This is the main issue faced by all kinds of organizations at the initial stage of the employee management. Sometimes, assigning efficient people for some particular job is difficult for the organizations. This problem may vary over the types of activities within the workplaces of the organizations (Bal et al. 2012). The main goals of the organizations in this area are; recruiting efficient people with the required skills with respect to the specific job roles they have to handle, assigning specific jobs according to the expertises, maintaining a proper hierarchical structure within the organization. The common moral purpose among the organizations deals with the influence individual choices with respect to their individual purposes. It refers to the activities where the supervisors modify organizational activities and perform co-operative works with respect to the sense of moral purpose of the employees. It is a social concept for the well beings of the employees and the proper management of the employee within the workplaces of the organizations. The main target of this concept is to motivate the employees by fulfilling their own purposes (Temminck, Mearns and Fruhen 2015). It is good for the organizations to follow the common moral purpose to motivate the employees and get efficient performance from the employees. The employees will feel good if their individual purposes are fulfilled while working within the organization. In this context, the management of eth organizations may face some problems regarding the identification of the individual purposes of the employees. Sometimes, it may also happen that the purposes of the employees are not aligned with the business goals of the organizations. In this type of case, it is very difficult to follow the common moral approach while ensuring the business demands of the organization (Walker and Kim 2015). In order to match the goals of the organizations and the employees, managers need to use their critical thinking approach and develop a very good employee-employer relationship within the organization. Competition, innovation and product diversity are contributing crises among the Fordist organizations. The organizations need to convert the management styles to support the new types of demands of the changed world. The organizations are not able to convert the whole system overnight. In order to adopt the alternative organizations structures the organizations may face many obstacles (Ruigrok and Van Tulder 2013). The two terms arrangement and managing are used for the same purpose but in two meanings. Arrangement refers to the collection of the necessary components or ideas for conversions of the previous system to a new for fulfilling the demands where as the term managing refers to the actual evaluation of the plan and resources. The desired goal of the organization is to change the management procedures with the respect to the new innovations and other characteristics of the current market. In this context, the obstacles can be removed by sing proper managing activities by the managers of the organizations (Ruigrok and Van Tulder 2013). In order to peacefully coexist the arrangement and managing the managers should understand the current status of eth management of the organizations and the demands of eth current situation. Critical thinking approach and efficient monitoring is the keys to get succeeded by peacefully adopting the necessary changes with peaceful co-existence of arrangement and management. References: Abell, P., 2014. Rational Choice Theory and the Analysis of Organizations.Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents, p.318. Bal, P.M., De Jong, S.B., Jansen, P.G. and Bakker, A.B., 2012. Motivating employees to work beyond retirement: A multi?level study of the role of I?deals and unit climate.Journal of Management Studies,49(2), pp.306-331. Bucherer, E., Eisert, U. and Gassmann, O., 2012. Towards systematic business model innovation: lessons from product innovation management.Creativity and Innovation Management,21(2), pp.183-198. Hyde, A., Clarke, M. and Drennan, J., 2013. The changing role of academics and the rise of managerialism. InThe academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges(pp. 39-52). Springer Netherlands. Liu, M. and Li, C., 2014. Environment pressures, managerial industrial relations ideologies and unionization in Chinese enterprises.British Journal of Industrial Relations,52(1), pp.82-111. Ruigrok, W. and Van Tulder, R., 2013.The logic of international restructuring: The management of dependencies in rival industrial complexes. Routledge. Temminck, E., Mearns, K. and Fruhen, L., 2015. Motivating employees towards sustainable behaviour.Business Strategy and the Environment,24(6), pp.402-412. Walker, R.M. and Kim, G.R., 2015. The determinates of Human Resource Management outcomes: a meta-regression analysis. InInternational Research Society for Public Management Conference, IRSPM 2015. Yang, B., 2012. Confucianism, socialism, and capitalism: A comparison of cultural ideologies and implied managerial philosophies and practices in the PR China.Human Resource Management Review,22(3), pp.165-178.