Global Warming Essay

The globular Warming scheme has become progressively popular over the late(prenominal) a couple of(prenominal) years. Citizens of the spotledge base are field encour erad to be to a greater extent than environmentally conscious by some some others including politicians, celebrities, and world organizations. The job with the opening lies in the fact that it has become more and more controversial as it pisss publicity and attention. The basic concept behind this theory is that the soldierykind was make with a balance of greenho workout sploshses.These gasses are course occurring within the aura and they essentially make the planet habitable by keeping it warm. When the world became more industrialized, the amount of carbon dioxide that was being emitted into the atmosphere increased. In the previous(prenominal) hundred years or so, that number has more or less(prenominal) skyrocketed when compared to the previous amount out-of-pocket to the invention and comm ode distri unlession of automobiles, aircraft, trains, and boats. The surplus of greenho expend gasses are beyond what the body politic send packing store and are creating a pseudo blanket around the world.The earth has indeedce become more and more hot, the globe has heated up by intimately single degree Fahrenheit over the away centuryand it has heated up more intensely over the past two decades. (IPCC, 2001) To be able to correctly put that into perspective one must have the k right awayledge that the temperature difference between the ice age and current times is nine degrees. The potential repercussions of the increase in spherical temperature include more intense storms, more severe droughts, and rising ocean levels.There are several ways to have a more positive impact on the environment. E verything from buying more expertness good cars to helping control the population has the potential to help reduce the effects of world(a) calefacient. One of the largest contri butors to the increase in international temperature in the past century has been the ever expanding population. It is a simple math problem, if one both(prenominal)one produces too some(a)(prenominal) greenhouse gasses and then proceeds to have septet children, the greenhouse emissions with increase even more so.The more people habituating the planet, the more potential at that place is for emission of greenhouse gasses. In short, the basis of this disputation other than years of documented reoceanrch and scientific discovery is what combat injury could we do by being more conservative in our use of energy and other entities that produce more than their share of greenhouse gasses? The practice as it stands now is none. The ravishful effects of ignoring this crisis are all but proven fact. The problem that the pro- global warm up theorists have created is that of social stand up and little else.While there whitethorn be scientific documentation to support some of the th eory, the media give births the problem with great sensationalism. orbiculate thaw and energy conservation has thus become a trend and losings some of its reasonedity by dint of this. The scare tactics utilize by the media to campaign awareness are just that, a linguistic ploy to gain favor. Awareness of this global threat reinforced public concern and environmental problems and thereby provided environmental activists, scientists, and policy makers with new momentum in their efforts to enkindle environmental protection. (McCright, 2000)This statement draws line to the potential benefits that would be received if the pro-global melt theorists were to draw enough attention to the tax return. Driven by social authorization and conviction to environmental protection, these activists misrepresent the actual threat and paint it as being much more intense and imminent than the scientific turn up concludes. The fact that the planets temperature is ever changing is signifi lowli fet, however there is no solid proof that reality are responsible for this rise.The earths temperature has undergo extreme highs and lows throughout its millions of years in existence and we as humans understand little well-nigh what has movementd those fluctuation. If humans did non exist billions of years ago, yet the temperature still changed dramatically, then why is it that scientists deed that humans are the deliver for this current phenomena? The answer to that question is unmapped however one could make the assumption that it may be due to our lack of understanding about the way in which carbon dioxide exists in the atmosphere.The public has no easy access to this information therefore it is slow forgotten or removed from the argument. Global warming is a theory that has been wildly blown out of proportion. Media backing and celebrity ownments connectd with semipolitical scare tactics have been apply to create the sense of state in this matter. The square conce rn is being masked by the radical that is being presented to the world. The supposed solution to the global warming theorists is to conserve. The real issue at hand is discovery. Science must be perfected or at least further tested before conclusions kindle be drawn.While establish exists on both sides, the side that acknowledges the existence of global warming at least has the appearance of more science on its side. The publicity brought to global warming john have the competency to relieve oneself people to accept it as fact rather than simply a theory. That being said, it is the belief of this writer that the pro-global warming theory is more valid than the anti-global warming theory. This conclusion was made mostly due to the distrust that this disciple grew for the anti-global warming supporters.The anti-side invalidates their own arguments by using some basic double-tongued thinking and aggressive tactics. Many of the websites and other sources to gain knowledge about the potential non-threat of global warming are extremist and use many common fallacies. For example, here is an excerpt from just one of the many anti-global warming websites available to all on the World Wide Web, We all know that the artificial construct cognize as cap and trade is postal code more than a fraud to get companies to pay more taxes.It forget have very little, to no, impact on CO2 levels, much less global warming. (Casey, 2009). The author assumes that the cap and trade issue is universally known and understood which a fallacy of hasty cosmopolitanization is. The second dent in that particular argument is that it appears to be an argument of outrage in the sense that it degrades the government and paints them to be money hungry and unconcerned with the upbeat of its peoples. Websites against global warming take personal attacks at the politicians or celebrities who endorse the idea of global warming.While these personal attacks may hold some general truth, they do non address that persons ability to become involved with an organization to create awareness for global warming. individualized attacks are used to dissuade the Ameri terminate public from siding with the pro-global warming theory. Celebrities are often used as spokespeople for various causes and charities, but they do not embody what they are speaking for. They are solely a resource to raise awareness to the general population.While it may be true that some scientific evidence has been withheld or not made as accessible to the general population due to its potential harm to the pro-global warming theory, this writer has not been dissuaded from her former coach of thought. It is very true that there are more humans on the planet than there were many years ago. It is also true that humans now use more advanced engine room that have the tendency to produce a lot of carbon dioxide. The link between what we understand about humans and their toil habits and the atmosphere may be blurry, but the question remains, why not conserve?In conclusion, the moral of the global warming novel is moderation. Little personal changes may affect the way in which the world climate is changing but if they do not, what harm would we have do? Riding a bike to work or walking to school not only reduces the amount of carbon dioxide being produced, it saves that person money. Global warming may not be as big a threat as the media makes it out to be, but there is scientific evidence supporting the fact that it just may be a threat.Global Warming EssayGlobal Warming is an issue that concerns almost everybody oecumenic it is the primary cause for the erratic and sometimes devastating weather that is experienced around the world. Global warming is causing the rise in sea level which in turn causes the flooding of coastal areas and areas with low elevation. Is global warming really possibility today? Scientists with the United Nations Environmental broadcast (UNEP) believe it is so (Mank, 2005). It is indisputable that there has been a rise in the concentration of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere during the last century, which scientists think may be one of the causes of global warming.The climate change however is not a direct result of the rise in greenhouse gases. leave alone global warming spell doom for our world? Scientists believe this to be so. Much depends on what actions we take now and in the coming years. Meteorologist Jagadish Shukla of the University of free state found out that deforestation would cause rainfall in the amazon River to decline by more than 26 portion from the current 2. 5 m. to about 1. 8 m. a year (Bellamy & Gifford, 2000). At the same time, the ardent of fossil fuels, particularly coal and oil, produces sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides which are barbaric to the atmosphere.Findings show that a single smokestack may produce as much as 500 tons of sulfur dioxide a day. When these gases integrate with oxygen a nd moisture, sulfuric acid and nitric acid is form. The rain go forth carry the acids to the ground (acid rain) which may cause the depletion of atomic number 20 and magnesium in the soil, elements needed by plants for the formation of chlorophyll and wood, or it may cause the release of aluminum in the soil, which are toxi puket and net defeat the roots of trees (Carwardine, 2000).This study intent to (1) know the effect of global warming worldwide thus knowing the global warming and doomsday and (2) expand our knowledge about the ozone slayer and do the humans are the reasons of causing global warming or if its just a native run that the earth goes through. II. Literature Review Ozone is an unstable oxygen that occurs naturally in the atmosphere (also called isothermal region), the upper portion of the atmosphere above 7 miles where clouds are rare.The ozone layer absorbs the dangerous ultraviolet-B (UV-B) rays while it allows the needed safe combust to pass through. Thou gh easily broken down by other gases in the stratosphere, it is constantly being repaired by the suns rays. However, man is destroying the ozone layer which serves as a protective umbrella against the suns harmful rays. In fact, the ozone layer is destroyed faster than the suns rays can produce it. It is being destroyed by industrial gases worry CFCs (Johnston, 2000). CFCs was discovered by Thomas Widgley Jr., a chemist on the job(p) at the Frigidaire Division of General Motors but were discovered dotty in 1974only after 44 years of use, used as coolants in refrigerators and air conditioners and aerosol propellants in spray cans, medical sterilizers, cleaning solvents for electronic components and raw materials for making plastic foams such as coffee cups. CFCs are estimated to account for 14 percent of global warming. It is dismaying to know that ozone depletion can be found in the south (Antarctica) and north (Greenland) poles (Dolan, 2006).According to British scientist Joe Fa rman, 40 percent of ozone depletion can be found in the confederation Pole. At the South Pole is a huge vortex with clouds dispassionate of tiny ice particles, giving chlorine millions of tiny spaces through which it can perform its deadly dance with ozone even faster (Simpson, 2000). Both holes at the poles are seasonal, opening and closing each year. In the northern hemisphere, a more populous region, ozone depletion rate is between three percent and vii percent for 17 years, as compared previously to only three percent for100 years.On the other hand, what are the effects of Ultraviolet-B rays to human beings and the ecosystem in general? To humans, they can cause skin cancer and cataract and damage the immune system. To the ecosystem, they can kill planktons (basic element of the ocean food chain), destroy plant action and crops and change global wind and weather patterns. In 1978, Canada, Sweden, the United States and other countries banned the use of CFCs in aerosols. Howev er, other uses of CFCs were found, effecting an increase in its production. The US still uses one-fourth of the worlds annual supply of CFCs (Turner, 2000).However, in September 1987, 24 nations cooperated for the first time to solve this environmental problem and passed the Montreal Protocol. The agreement issued a call for developed nations to freeze the use and production of CFCs while cutting 50 percent of use and production by 1999. Still, the CFCs currently rising through the troposphere leave alone take seven to 10 years to drift up to the stratosphere. The troposphere is the portion of the atmosphere that is below the stratosphere, extending outer about seven to 10 miles from the earths surface (Bellamy & Gifford, 2000). III.methodological analysis In order to accomplish this study, the researcher used two different methods to make the investigation more informative, accurate, and successful. Aside from gathering information through internet, the researcher gathered inform ation through statistics, charts, and observation. IV. Results and analysis During the earliest times, the life-styles of our ancestors were very simple. The air they breathed was clean. The streams were clear and free of harmful organisms. They used natural fertilizers for their agricultural crops. The surroundings were free of household throwaways.Today, there has been a ugly result in science and technology. Such advances have brought about changes in terms of new products, improved equipment, and more effective methodologies. Unfortunately, this same technology which made life easier for us produced wastes which are now affecting the fibre of our surrounding, air, water, and land. Factories and motor vehicles send tons of pollutants into our air. Excessive air taint poses a danger to our health and environment. It can likewise cause stunted growth and even death to our plants.Out streams are polluted by discharges from industrial plants that use chemicals. Garbage and sink w astes are carelessly thrown in our surroundings. Synthetic fertilizers and insecticides pollute our land and farm products (Johnston, 2000). At the same time, the impatient of fossil fuels, particularly coal and oil, produces sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides which are hazardous to the atmosphere. Findings show that a single smokestack may produce as much as 500 tons of sulfur dioxide a day. When these gases combine with oxygen and moisture, sulfuric acid and nitric acid are formed (Jenner, 1999).The rain will carry the acids to the ground (acid rain) which may cause the depletion of calcium and magnesium in the soil, elements needed by plants for the formation of chlorophyll and wood, or it may cause the release of aluminum in the soil, which are poisonous and can kill the roots of trees. Moreover, nitrous oxide or laughing gas is a colorless gas with a sweet taste and perfume that is used as an anesthetic in minor surgery that pee is responsible for about 6 percent of the huma n contributes to greenhouse warming.Methane or cow gas, on the other hand, makes up about 18 percent of human contributions to greenhouse effect. Cattle, sheep, goats, and other cud-chewing savages give off methane, in burps and throttle as they digest (Cairncross, 2002). Experts said that what is happening right now is not a matter of adding a few degrees to the average temperature of a community. A rise of this magnitude may cause life, for without the environment, creatures on earth cannot subsist (Davidson, 1999). CFCs are estimated to account for 14 percent of global warming.Experts said that what is happening right now is not a matter of adding a few degrees to the average temperature of a community. A rise of this magnitude may cause life, for without the environment, creatures on earth cannot survive With these, are we all aware of the extent of the damages brought about by modernization? Have we contributed to such environmental dilemma? What have we done to denigrate su ch danger to our lives? How can we take care of our environment? We must undertake measures to preserve our resources and minimize utilization of energy before its too late.Our fight against pollution is an initial step toward conserving our environmental resources and energy. We must all join work force for this common goal. If present day emissions of greenhouse gases continue, it is estimated that the rate of increase in global mean temperatures will reach about 0. 30 0C per decade. This will mean a likely increase of 1 0C above the present level by the year 2025, and 30 0C before the end of the succeeding(prenominal) century. A. Resolution a. ) Recycling and Reuse of Solid Wastes Solid wastes are now viewed as a potential resource which must be recovered and reused whenever possible.Since disposal forest resources are rapidly being depleted, recycling solid wastes offer a solution to both. Consider the element phosphorus. Mined from orthophosphate ores, it is construct into fertilizers. It enters the plant tissues and we obtain it when we eat plant as vegetable. This is subsequent excreted and joins the sewage system. The sewage system sludge can be used directly as fertilizer or soil conditioner. Used bottles can be used over and over again. Durable plastic containers can be saved for more household uses.Tires can be recapped and used again. previous(a) clothing materials are used as kitchen towels and bags (see Environment Matters industrys Guide to the Issues, the Challenges and the Solutions, 1999). If the materials cannot be used over several times, then they can be shredded and converted into a new form. Old newspapers are repulped into new paper. Broken glasses are ground and manufactured into new ones. Tires are processed to raw rubber. Protein leftovers are manufactured into animal feeds. b. ) Conserving our ForestsEvery now and then we receive alarming news about our forests being denuded. Big logging concessionaires indiscriminately cut down trees without toil reforestation measures. Without trees, the soil is loosened and rapid erosion occurs. As a result fertile topsoil is washed away, which makes growth of other forms of flora almost impossible. We suffer great loss of timber, wildlife, and other forest products. yet the greatest danger is the occurrence of floods and global warming that cause losses of food, properties, and lives (Davidson, 1999).